🔗 Share this article

When I am a game master, I historically steered clear of heavy use of luck during my tabletop roleplaying sessions. I preferred was for story direction and what happened in a game to be determined by player choice as opposed to random chance. However, I chose to change my approach, and I'm incredibly pleased with the outcome.

The Spark: Observing an Improvised Tool

A popular streamed game features a DM who frequently asks for "fate rolls" from the adventurers. The process entails choosing a type of die and assigning potential outcomes based on the result. It's fundamentally no unlike consulting a pre-generated chart, these are devised spontaneously when a course of events has no clear resolution.

I opted to test this technique at my own table, mostly because it appeared interesting and presented a change from my standard routine. The outcome were fantastic, prompting me to think deeply about the often-debated balance between planning and randomization in a tabletop session.

A Memorable Story Beat

In a recent session, my party had just emerged from a massive conflict. When the dust settled, a cleric character inquired after two key NPCs—a sibling duo—had made it. Rather than choosing an outcome, I asked for a roll. I instructed the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. I defined the outcomes as: a low roll, both died; on a 5-9, only one would die; a high roll, they made it.

The player rolled a 4. This triggered a profoundly poignant scene where the party discovered the corpses of their allies, forever holding hands in death. The party held funeral rites, which was uniquely meaningful due to prior story developments. In a concluding reward, I chose that the NPCs' bodies were strangely restored, containing a enchanted item. By chance, the item's contained spell was precisely what the party lacked to resolve another critical story problem. It's impossible to orchestrate such perfect coincidences.

Improving On-the-Spot Skills

This event caused me to question if randomization and thinking on your feet are in fact the essence of D&D. While you are a detail-oriented DM, your skill to pivot may atrophy. Players often find joy in ignoring the best constructed plots. Therefore, a good DM must be able to adapt swiftly and create scenarios in real-time.

Employing on-the-spot randomization is a fantastic way to train these skills without venturing too far outside your comfort zone. The strategy is to use them for minor circumstances that don't fundamentally change the session's primary direction. For instance, I would not employ it to determine if the main villain is a traitor. However, I might use it to figure out whether the PCs enter a room just in time to see a key action occurs.

Enhancing Shared Narrative

Luck rolls also works to maintain tension and foster the sensation that the game world is alive, progressing in reaction to their decisions immediately. It reduces the perception that they are merely characters in a rigidly planned script, thereby bolstering the cooperative foundation of storytelling.

Randomization has long been embedded in the original design. The game's roots were reliant on random tables, which fit a playstyle focused on exploration. Although contemporary D&D often focuses on narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, this isn't always the best approach.

Finding the Sweet Spot

It is perfectly nothing wrong with doing your prep. However, it's also fine no issue with stepping back and allowing the rolls to determine certain outcomes instead of you. Direction is a significant aspect of a DM's role. We need it to manage the world, yet we frequently find it hard to give some up, at times when doing so can lead to great moments.

My final advice is this: Do not fear of relinquishing a bit of your plan. Try a little randomness for smaller story elements. The result could create that the organic story beat is significantly more memorable than anything you could have planned by yourself.